Formulating a sealant fluid using gas to liquid base stocks

ABSTRACT

It has been determined that sealant fluid formulations comprising a lubricant oil derived from Fischer-Tropsch waxes demonstrate performance comparable to sealant fluid comprising lubricants derived from polyalphaolefins (PAO&#39;s). The sealant fluids of the current invention can provide excellent performance properties similar to those provided by PAO based sealant fluids, but at lower cost.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of copending applicationSer. No. 12/605,153 filed Oct. 29, 2009, and claims priority therefrom.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a means of preparing a sealant fluid for usein turbomachinery as a barrier or buffer fluid from gas to liquid (GTL)or coal to liquid based feed formulations, such as Fischer-Tropsch wax.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Sealant fluids, more specifically barrier fluids and buffer fluids arethe external fluids that are used in wet seals to prevent leakage ofprocess fluids to the environment. They are used in devices such aspumps, compressors, and other types of turbomachinery in which thepressure of the process fluid is increased. A barrier fluid may also beused as a buffer fluid. A barrier fluid may be maintained at a pressurethat is higher than that of the process fluid, while a buffer fluid ismaintained at a pressure that is the same as or lower than that of theprocess fluid. The pressure employed is dependent upon the types ofseals used in the machinery.

There are several purposes for using a sealant fluid, including:

-   -   (a) insulating a hazardous process fluid which should not be        released to the environment;    -   (b) minimizing pollution problems;    -   (c) minimizing leaks and waste of an expensive product; and    -   (d) minimizing unscheduled down time.

A sealant fluid should be:

-   -   (a) compatible with the process being performed by the        machinery;    -   (b) compatible with the seal materials;    -   (c) a good lubricant and heat transfer medium for the seal        faces; and    -   (d) benign to the environment and to workers.

Sealant fluids are generally selected from the group comprising mineraloils, polyalpha olefins (PAO's), kerosene or diesel, glycols, alcoholsand water. PAO based sealant fluids provide excellent performance overmineral oil diesels in terms of oxidative stability, high temperatureperformance and low temperature performance PAO based fluid isexpensive, however. GTL based formulations have been developed thatprovide excellent performance at reduced costs. The GTL and CTL basedformulations possess high viscosity index and low pour point, and aremade using high quality base oil (see Table 1) that will soon becomereadily available at prices competitive to conventional Group II andGroup III base oils.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTIONS

Two fluid formations suitable for use as sealant fluids inturbomachinery were developed using GTL XXL and GTL XL (see Table 1) aslubricants which were blended with additives as shown in Table 2. Theperformance of these products was evaluated against sealant fluidderived from polyalphaolefins (Table 2). It was found that GTL and CTLbased formulations can provide comparable performance. Typically PAObased sealant fluid cost is high. GTL and CTL based sealant fluids canprovide excellent performance properties similar to those provided byPAO based fluids but at lower costs.

This application discloses a fluid, suitable for use in turbomachineryas a sealant fluid. It comprises: a lubricant base oil having an averagemolecular weight greater than 320, a viscosity index greater than 118,and a weight percent paraffinic carbons greater than 97%. The sealantfluid of this invention has a pour point of less than −60° C. and asequence II foam tendency by ASTM D 892-03 of less than 30 ml.

We have invented a process for making a sealant fluid with very low pourpoint and improved foam tendencies. The process comprises the steps ofa) selecting a waxy feed having greater than 75 wt % n-paraffins andless than 25 ppm total combined nitrogen and sulfur; b)hydroisomerization dewaxing the waxy feed to produce a lubricant baseoil; c) fractionating the lubricant base oil into one or more fractions;d) selecting one or more of the fractions having an average molecularweight greater than 320, a viscosity index greater than 118, a weightpercent olefins less than 25; and e) blending the one or more selectedfractions with oil additives. The sealant fluid has a pour point of lessthan −60C, a Viscosity Index of at least 129, and a sequence II foamtendency by ASTM D 892-03 of less than 30 ml.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The FIGURE illustrates the manner in which barrier fluid is added to apump and its use in preventing leakage of fluid being pumped.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The test methods and terminology used throughout this specification areconventional and understood by those of ordinary skill in thelubricating arts. A few are briefly mentioned in the followingparagraphs.

Noack volatility is defined as the mass of oil, expressed in weight %,which is lost when the oil is heated at 250° C. with a constant flow ofair drawn through it for 60 min., measured according to ASTM D5800-05,Procedure B.

“Molecules with cycloparaffinic functionality” mean any molecule thatis, or contains as one or more substituents, a monocyclic or a fusedmulticyclic saturated hydrocarbon group.

“Molecules with monocycloparaffinic functionality” mean any moleculethat is a monocyclic saturated hydrocarbon group of three to seven ringcarbons or any molecule that is substituted with a single monocyclicsaturated hydrocarbon group of three to seven ring carbons.

“Molecules with multicycloparaffinic functionality” mean any moleculethat is a fused multicyclic saturated hydrocarbon ring group of two ormore fused rings, any molecule that is substituted with one or morefused multicyclic saturated hydrocarbon ring groups of two or more fusedrings, or any molecule that is substituted with more than one monocyclicsaturated hydrocarbon group of three to seven ring carbons.

Molecules with cycloparaffinic functionality, molecules withmonocycloparaffinic functionality, and molecules withmulticycloparaffinic functionality are reported as weight percent andare determined by a combination of Field Ionization Mass Spectroscopy(FIMS), HPLC-UV for aromatics, and Proton NMR for olefins.

Oxidator BN measures the response of lubricating oil in a simulatedapplication. High values, or long times to adsorb one liter of oxygen,indicate good stability. Oxidator BN can be measured via a Dornte-typeoxygen absorption apparatus (R. W. Dornte “Oxidation of White Oils,”Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 28, page 26, 1936), under 1atmosphere of pure oxygen at 340° F., time to absorb 1000 ml of O2 by100 g. of oil is reported. In the Oxidator BN test, 0.8 ml of catalystis used per 100 grams of oil. The catalyst is a mixture of solublemetal-naphthenates simulating the average metal analysis of usedcrankcase oil. The additive package is 80 millimoles of zincbispolypropylenephenyldithiophosphate per 100 grams of oil.

Molecular characterizations can be performed by methods known in theart, including Field Ionization Mass Spectroscopy (FIMS) and n-d-Manalysis (ASTM D 3238-95 (Re-approved 2005) with normalization). InFIMS, the base oil is characterized as alkanes and molecules withdifferent numbers of unsaturations. The molecules with different numbersof unsaturations may be comprised of cycloparaffins, olefins, andaromatics. If aromatics are present in significant amount, they areidentified as 4-unsaturations. When olefins are present in significantamounts, they are identified as 1-unsaturations. The total of the1-unsaturations, 2-unsaturations, 3-unsaturations, 4-unsaturations,5-unsaturations, and 6-unsaturations from the FIMS analysis, minus thewt % olefins by proton NMR, and minus the wt % aromatics by HPLC-UV isthe total weight percent of molecules with cycloparaffinicfunctionality. If the aromatics content was not measured, it was assumedto be less than 0.1 wt % and not included in the calculation for totalweight percent of molecules with cycloparaffinic functionality. Thetotal weight percent of molecules with cycloparaffinic functionality isthe sum of the weight percent of molecules with monocycloparaffinicfunctionality and the weight percent of molecules withmulticycloparaffinic functionality.

Molecular weights are determined by ASTM D2503-92 (Reapproved 2007). Themethod uses thermoelectric measurement of vapor pressure (VPO). Incircumstances where there is insufficient sample volume, an alternativemethod of ASTM D2502-04 may be used; and where this has been used it isindicated.

Volatile organic content (VOC) is measured by ASTM D 2369-07. A lowvalue is preferred.

Cleveland Open Cup (COC) flash point is measured by ASTM D 92-05.

Pour point is measured by ASTM D5950-02 (Reapproved 2007), using anautomatic tilt method.

The aniline point test indicates if an oil is likely to swell or shrinkthe elastomers (rubber compounds) that come in contact with the oil. Theaniline point is called the “aniline point temperature,” which is thelowest temperature (° F. or ° C.) at which equal volumes of aniline(C6H5NH2) and the oil form a single phase. The aniline point (AP) is anindicator of the amount of aromatic hydrocarbons in an oil sample. A lowAP is indicative of higher aromatics, while a high AP is indicative oflower aromatics content. The aniline point is determined by ASTMD611-07. In some embodiments, lubricant base oil fractions derived fromhighly paraffinic wax, such as Fischer-Tropsch waxes, have a relativelylow aniline point. This can be attributed to the lubricant base oilhaving a high ratio of molecules with monocycloparaffinic functionalityto molecules with multicycloparaffinic functionality. Accordingly, thelubricant base oil fractions derived from highly paraffinic wax with lowaniline points exhibit good elastomer compatibility.

The Four Ball Wear Test which measures antiwear properties is set forthin ASTM D-4172-94 (Reapproved 2004) (4-ball wear). The testing is doneon a Falex Variable Drive Four-Ball Wear Test Machine. Four balls arearranged in an equilateral tetrahedron. The lower three balls areclamped securely in a test cup filled with lubricant and the upper ballis held by a chuck that is motor-driven. The upper ball rotates againstthe fixed lower balls. Load is applied in an upward direction through aweight/lever arm system. Loading is through a continuously variablepneumatic loading system. Heaters allow operation at elevated oiltemperatures. The three stationary steel balls are immersed in 10milliliters of sample to be tested, and the fourth steel ball is rotatedon top of the three stationary balls in “point-to-point contact.” Themachine is operated for one hour at 75° C. with a load of 20 kilogramsand a rotational speed of 1800 revolutions per minute. The lubricatingoils tested generally contain all the additives typically found in anindustrial oil.

Feeds used to prepare the lubricant base oil according to the process ofthe invention are waxy feeds containing greater than 75 weight percentnormal paraffins, preferably at least 85 weight percent normalparaffins, and most preferably at least 90 weight percent normalparaffins. The waxy feed may be a conventional petroleum derived feed,such as, for example, slack wax, or it may be derived from a syntheticfeed, such as, for example, a feed prepared from a Fischer-Tropschsynthesis. A major portion of the feed should boil above 650° F.Preferably, at least 80 weight percent of the feed will boil above 650°F., and most preferably at least 90 weight percent will boil above 650°F. Highly paraffinic feeds used in carrying out the invention typicallywill have an initial pour point above 0° C., more usually above 10° C.

Slack wax can be obtained from conventional petroleum derived feedstocksby either hydrocracking or by solvent refining of the lube oil fraction.Typically, slack wax is recovered from solvent dewaxing feedstocksprepared by one of these processes. Hydrocracking is usually preferredbecause hydrocracking will also reduce the nitrogen content to a lowvalue. With slack wax derived from solvent refined oils, deoiling may beused to reduce the nitrogen content. Hydrotreating of the slack wax canbe used to lower the nitrogen and sulfur content. Slack waxes possess avery high viscosity index, normally in the range of from about 140 to200, depending on the oil content and the starting material from whichthe slack wax was prepared. Therefore, slack waxes are suitable for thepreparation of lubricant base oils having a very high viscosity index.

The waxy feed useful in this invention has less than 25 ppm totalcombined nitrogen and sulfur. Nitrogen is measured by melting the waxyfeed prior to oxidative combustion and chemiluminescence detection byASTM D 4629-96. The test method is further described in U.S. Pat. No.6,503,956, incorporated by reference herein. Sulfur is measured bymelting the waxy feed prior to ultraviolet fluorescence by ASTM D5453-00. The test method is further described in U.S. Pat. No.6,503,956, incorporated by reference herein.

Waxy feeds useful in this invention are expected to be plentiful andrelatively cost competitive in the near future as large-scaleFischer-Tropsch synthesis processes come into production. The waxy feedsmay be produced from any synthesis gas, such as those made in a GTL or aCTL process, using a Fischer-Tropsch process. Synthesis gas fed to theFischer-Tropsch process may be produced from a broad range ofhydrocarbons, including waste plastic or other polymers, biomass,cellulose, vegetation, agricultural waste, waste paper or cardboard,wood, natural gas, shale or coal. Syncrude prepared from theFischer-Tropsch process comprises a mixture of various solid, liquid,and gaseous hydrocarbons. Those Fischer-Tropsch products which boilwithin the range of lubricant base oil contain a high proportion of waxwhich makes them ideal candidates for processing into lubricant baseoil. Accordingly, Fischer-Tropsch wax represents an excellent feed forpreparing high quality lubricant base oils according to the process ofthe invention. Fischer-Tropsch wax is normally solid at room temperatureand, consequently, displays poor low temperature properties, such aspour point and cloud point. However, following hydroisomerization of thewax, Fischer-Tropsch derived lubricant base oils having excellent lowtemperature properties may be prepared. A general description of thehydroisomerization dewaxing process may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,135,638 and 5,282,958; and U.S. patent application 20050133409.

The hydroisomerization is achieved by contacting the waxy feed with ahydroisomerization catalyst in an isomerization zone underhydroisomerizing conditions. In one embodiment, the hydroisomerizationcatalyst preferably comprises a shape selective intermediate pore sizemolecular sieve, a noble metal hydrogenation component, and a refractoryoxide support. In one embodiment, the shape selective intermediate poresize molecular sieve is preferably selected from the group consisting ofSAPO-11, SAPO-31, SAPO-41, SM-3, ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, ZSM-48, ZSM-57,SSZ-32, offretite, ferrierite, and combinations thereof SAPO-11, SM-3,SSZ-32, ZSM-23, and combinations thereof are more sometimes morepreferred. In one embodiment the noble metal hydrogenation component isplatinum, palladium, or combinations thereof.

The hydroisomerizing conditions depend on the waxy feed used, thehydroisomerization catalyst used, whether or not the catalyst issulfided, the desired yield, and the desired properties of the lubricantbase oil. In one embodiment, the hydroisomerizing conditions includetemperatures of 260° C. to about 413° C. (500 to about 775° F.), a totalpressure of 15 to 3000 psig, and a hydrogen to feed ratio from about 0.5to 30 MSCF/bbl, or from about 1 to about 10 MSCF/bbl. In someembodiments, hydrogen will be separated from the product and recycled tothe isomerization zone.

In one embodiment, the hydroisomerization conditions are tailored toproduce one or more fractions having greater than 5 weight percentmolecules with monocycloparaffinic functionality, or having greater than10 weight percent molecules with monocycloparaffinic functionality. Inone embodiment the fractions will have a viscosity index greater than140 and a pour point less than zero° C. In some embodiments, the pourpoint will be less than −10° C.

Optionally, the lubricant base oil produced by hydroisomerizationdewaxing may be hydrofinished. The hydrofinishing may occur in one ormore steps, either before or after fractionating of the lubricant baseoil into one or more fractions. The hydrofinishing is intended toimprove the oxidation stability, UV stability, and appearance of theproduct by removing aromatics, olefins, color bodies, and solvents. Ageneral description of hydrofinishing may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos.3,852,207 and 4,673,487, incorporated herein. The hydrofinishing stepmay be needed to reduce the weight percent olefins in the lubricant baseoil to less than 10, preferably less than 5, more preferably less than1, and most preferably less than 0.5. The hydrofinishing step may alsobe needed to reduce the weight percent aromatics to less than 0.3,preferably less than 0.06, more preferably less than 0.02, and mostpreferably less than 0.01.

In one embodiment the hydroisomerizing and hydrofinishing conditions inthe process of this invention are tailored to produce one or moreselected fractions of lubricant base oil having less than 0.06 weightpercent aromatics, less than 5 weight percent olefins, and greater than5 weight percent molecules with cycloparaffinic functionality.

The lubricant base oil fractions, in one embodiment, have a very highviscosity index, generally greater than 118, but they may also have aneven higher viscosity index, such as greater than an amount calculatedby the equation: Viscosity Index=28*Ln(Kinematic Viscosity at 100° C.,in cSt)+95; wherein Ln refers to the natural logarithm to the base ‘e’.Viscosity index is determined by ASTM D 2270-04.

The lubricant base oil fractions have measurable quantities ofunsaturated molecules measured by FIMS (Field Ionization MassSpectroscopy). In one embodiment they have greater than 5 weight percentmolecules with monocycloparaffinic functionality, in another embodimentthey have greater than 10. In one embodiment they have a ratio of weightpercent molecules with monocycloparaffin functionality to weight percentmolecules with multicycloparaffinic functionality greater than 2.1,greater than 6, greater than 15, greater than 40 or greater than 100.The presence of predominantly molecules with monocycloparaffinicfunctionality in the lubricant base oil fractions provides excellentoxidation stability as well as desired additive solubility and elastomercompatibility. In one embodiment the lubricant base oil fractions have aweight percent olefins less than 10, less than 5, less than 1, or lessthan 0.5. The lubricant base oil fractions have a weight percentaromatics less than 0.3, less than 0.06, or less than 0.02.

In one embodiment the lubricant base oil fractions have low levels ofalkyl branches per 100 carbons, such as less than 8 alkyl branches per100 carbons, or less than 7. The branches are alkyl branches and in oneembodiment they are predominantly methyl branches (—CH3). In addition,the alkyl branches can be positioned over various branch carbonresonances by carbon-13 NMR. The low levels of predominantly methylbranches impart high viscosity index and good biodegradability to thelubricating base oils, and sealant oils made from them.

In one embodiment the lubricant base oil fractions of this inventionwill have T90-T10 boiling point distributions less than 180 degrees F.,such as between 50 degrees F. and less than 180 degrees F., or between90 and less than 150 degrees F.

In some embodiments, where the olefin and aromatics contents aresignificantly low in the lubricant base oil fraction of the sealantfluid, the Oxidator BN of the lubricant base oil will be greater than 25hours, preferably greater than 35 hours, more preferably greater than 40hours. Oxidator BN is a convenient way to measure the oxidationstability of lubricating base oils. The Oxidator BN test is described byStangeland et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,852,207. The Oxidator BN testmeasures the resistance to oxidation by means of a Dornte-type oxygenabsorption apparatus. See R. W. Dornte “Oxidation of White Oils,”Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 28, page 26, 1936. Normally,the conditions are one atmosphere of pure oxygen at 340° F. The resultsare reported in hours to absorb 1000 ml of O2 by 100 g. of oil. In theOxidator BN test, 0.8 ml of catalyst is used per 100 grams of oil and anadditive package is included in the oil. The catalyst is a mixture ofsoluble metal naphthenates in kerosene. The mixture of soluble metalnaphthenates simulates the average metal analysis of used crankcase oil.The level of metals in the catalyst is as follows: Copper=6,927 ppm;Iron=4,083 ppm; Lead=80,208 ppm; Manganese=350 ppm; Tin=3565 ppm. Theadditive package is 80 millimoles of zincbispolypropylenephenyldithiophosphate per 100 grams of oil, orapproximately 1.1 grams of OLOA 260. The Oxidator BN test measures theresponse of lubricating base oil in a simulated application.

High values, or long times to consume one liter of oxygen, indicate goodoxidation stability. Traditionally it is considered that the Oxidator BNshould be above 7 hours, but the Oxidator BN of the lubricant base oilfractions of this invention are preferably much higher.

OLOA is an acronym for Oronite Lubricating Oil Additive®, which is aregistered trademark of Chevron Oronite.

EXAMPLES Example 1

Sample of hydrotreated Fischer-Tropsch wax made using a Fe-basedFischer-Tropsch catalyst was analyzed and found to have the propertiesas shown in Table 1.

The Fischer-Tropsch wax was hydroisomerized over a Pt/SAPO-11 catalystwith an alumina binder. Operating conditions included temperaturesbetween 625° F. and 695° F. (329° C. and 399° C.), LHSV of 0.6 to 1.0hr-1, reactor pressure of 300-400 psig, and once-through hydrogen ratesof between 4 and 6 MSCF/bbl. The reactor effluent passed directly to asecond reactor containing a Pt/Pd on silica-alumina hydrofinishingcatalyst operated at 1000 psig. Conditions in the second reactorincluded a temperature of about 450° F. (232° C.) a LHSV of 1.0 hr-1,and a once-through hydrogen flow rate of between 5 and 7 MSCF/bbl.

The products boiling above 650° F. were fractionated by vacuumdistillation to produce distillate fractions of different viscositygrades, as shown in Table 1, below.

TABLE 1 Classification XXL XL Kinematic Viscosity 6.31 11.16 @ 40° C.,cSt Kinematic Viscosity 2.032 2.988 @ 100° C. cSt Viscosity Index 118125 Cold Crank Viscosity 975 1,525 @ −40° C., cP Pour Point, ° C. −57−36 n-d-m Molecular Weight, 320 375 gm/mol (VPO) Density, gm/ml 0.79560.8059 Refractive Index 1.4453 1.4507 Paraffinic Carbon, % 97.82 96.97Naphthenic Carbon, % 2.18 3.03 Aromatic Carbon, % 0.00 0.00 Carbon, Wt.% 85.14 85.23 Hydrogen, Wt. % 14.86 14.77 Oxidator BN, hrs 42.82 35.9ANTEK SULFUR <1 <2 LOW LEVEL <0.1 <0.1 NITROGEN Noack, wt. % 81.9 26.8HPLC-UV (LUBES) Aromatics Total 0.00226 0.00261 COC Flash Point, ° C.168 206 SIMDIST TBP @0.5 534 679 TBP (WT %), F. TBP @5 588 701 TBP @10604 709 TBP @20 625 720 TBP @30 640 728 TBP @40 652 735 TBP @50 663 741TBP @60 672 748 TBP @70 682 756 TBP @80 692 764 TBP @90 702 774 TBP @95709 782 TBP @99.5 724 802 FIMS Alkanes 85.4 75.3 1-Unsaturation 13.623.2 2-Unsaturation 0.5 1.1 3-Unsaturation 0.2 0.2 4-Unsaturation 0.1 05-Unsaturation 0.2 0 6-Unsaturation 0 0.2

Example 2

The Fischer-Tropsch derived lubricant base oils prepared above anddepicted in Table 1 were blended with additives comprising antioxidant,antiwear, foam inhibitor, pour point depressant and metal deactivators,resulting in the sealant fluids of this invention, which are depicted incolumns 2 and 3 of Table 2.

TABLE 2 Barrier Fluid Comparison Barrier Barrier Barrier IND Fluid AFluid B Fluid C CHEVRON SYNFLUID (R), 4 CST 99.3475 GTL Fluid-XXL 94.24GTL Fluid-XL 94.24 Polyol Ester 5.00 5.00 Amine Phosphate 0.2000 0.200.20 Combination of Phenolic and aminic 0.2000 0.20 0.20 antioxidantTolutriazol 0.0500 0.05 0.05 Acrylic Defoamer 0.0025 Triphenylphosphorothionate 0.2000 .20 .20 Silicone based Foam Inhibitor 0.01 0.01Pour point depressant 0.10 0.10 Royal Purple Barrier Fluid Properties toTest: GT22 API Gravity 41.1 43.9 41.8 Saybolt Color +30 +30 +30Appearance 1 1 1 Vis at 40 C. 16.92 6.615 11.37 5 Vis at 100 C. 3.8892.127 3.065 1.9 VI 125 129 132 Flash Pt, C. (F.) 218 166 202 168.3 PourPoint, C. (F.) <−63 <−63 <−60 −56.7 Foam, Seq, I, II and III Seq I (FT)0 0 0 Seq I (FS) 0 0 0 Seq II (FT) 0 30 0 Seq II (FS) 0 0 0 Seq III (FT)0 0 0 Seq III (FS) 0 0 0 PDSC, Induction 220 213 219 Temp ° C., 100/min;200 psi O2 Four Ball Wear 0.316 0.491/.382* 0.329 (1800 rpm, 20k, 75 C.,1 hr), mm scar dia VOC content, D2369, 4.6 118 15 gm/lit Aniline Point,F. 246.7 216.8 231.1

Barrier Fluid A is a PAO based sealant fluid which contains an antiwear,antioxidant, metal deactivator and a defoamer. The PAO sealant fluiddoes not contain foam inhibitor or a pour point depressant. BarrierFluids B and C are GTL based barrier fluids. Royal Purple is acommercial synthetic PAO based sealant fluid.

Overall GTL based sealant fluid will be significantly less expensivethan the PAO based sealant fluid while providing comparable performance.

What is claimed is: 1.-18. (canceled)
 19. A process for making a sealantfluid, comprising: a. selecting a waxy feed having: i. greater than 75wt % n-paraffins; and ii. less than 25 ppm total combined nitrogen andsulfur; b. hydroisomerization dewaxing the waxy feed to produce alubricant base oil; c. fractionating the lubricant base oil into one ormore fractions; d. selecting one or more of the fractions having: i. anaverage molecular weight greater than or equal to 320; ii. a viscosityindex greater than or equal to 118; iii. a weight percent olefins lessthan 25; and e. blending the one or more selected fractions with anadditive package comprising a thickener to produce a barrier fluidhaving a VI of at least
 120. 20. The process of claim 19, wherein thesealant fluid is a barrier fluid or a buffer fluid.